As we here at the Lord Monckton Foundation, are by nature open-minded and skeptical, we have provided a large number of LINKS here on this page.
The 'Directors Cut' of personal LINK choices will be listed here shortly.
Not all of these LINKS have been reviewed, as they have been gathered from many sources related to the topic in question. Many of these sites have arrived at different conclusions to us. Where we are attempting to draw conclusions from empirical evidence, many of the sites of these LINKS appeal purely to emotion and unsupported motherhood statements, and lack a rational and reasoned approach. Please recognise there is a difference between slanted propaganda and open scientific discussion.
We ask only that when inspecting these sites, you ask yourself the following:
Does the site provide specific supporting empirical scientific evidence for each of the arguments or ideas it puts forward?
Or does the site rely primarily and predominantly on the 'evidence free' power and authority of 'special individuals'; government agencies; scientific institutions; and so on? If someone is using SCIENCE to justify or support an argument or proposition, SCIENCE relies on observations and experiments from the real world in the form of EVIDENCE. Unless you are given references to empirical science containing evidence you can review and reproduce if you wish, it is not SCIENCE.