google-site-verification: googlefe22bfd737719451.html Skip to main content
my account
site map
Tuesday, April 02 2013


Can Australia’s environmental madness be cured?

Can cutting CO2 emissions be justified any longer?

In Melbourne the head of the UN’s climate panel, Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, admitted recently there had been no global warming for 17 years. No computer model had predicted that. Only one national news medium reported him. The others sulked.

RSS Inc’s satellites suggests no warming for 23 years – almost a quarter of a century.

In London The Economist had – until now – taken a hard-line, extremist stance about "global warming". Last week, for the first time, it conceded that the scientific literature is divided on how much warming doubling CO2 will cause.

In Oxford Dr. Myles Allen, who had once predicted 5 Celsius degrees’ warming by 2100, now predicts less than 2 Cº.

The economics as well as the science has collapsed.

In Geneva, the World Federation of Scientists is about to publish a paper by me entitled

Even if the UN were right to predict 3 Cº warming from 2000-2100, even if Lord Stern were right to say the cost of failing to prevent it was 1.5% of GDP, the cost of abating this decade’s predicted 0.14 Cº CO2-driven warming by methods like Australia’s carbon tax will be 45 times the cost of inaction.

How so? Australia emits just 1.2% of global CO2, of which the carbon tax will abate at most 5% in a decade, cutting global emissions by just 0.06%.

So the CO2 tax will cut worldwide CO2 concentration from a predicted business-as-usual 410 μatm to – well – 409.988 μatm. Not a lot.

In turn, global surface temperature will fall by a mere 0.00005 Cº – just 1/1000 of the minimum detectable global temperature change.

Even if carbon taxes happened worldwide, and even if they succeeded, there would be no way to measure that they had worked.

Worse, the cost of Australia’s CO2 tax alone will be $162 billion over ten years, equivalent to $3.2 quadrillion per Cº of warming abated.

Abating the 0.14 Cº CO2-driven warming predicted for this decade via CO2 mitigation measures equivalent to Australia’s would cost $450 trillion, or $65,000 for every man, woman and child worldwide.

That is two-thirds of global GDP over ten years.

If the UN’s models are over-predicting as grossly as the past couple of decades’ absence of warming suggests, acting on CO2 today could be 100 times costlier than adapting to warmer weather the day after tomorrow.

CO2 mitigation measures inexpensive enough to be affordable will be ineffective. Measures expensive enough to be effective will be unaffordable.

Since the premium is 50-100 times the cost of the risk, don’t take out insurance. That is a precautionary principle worthy of the name.

Australia’s CO2 tax is five times the collapsing European rate. It is 20 times the notional Chinese rate. Most of Australia’s competitors do not have CO2 taxes at all. Few will adopt them now.

The tax is pointlessly crippling industries and households throughout Australia with unprecedented increases in fuel and power costs.

It is bankrupting the Federal Treasury, which had a $70 billion surplus growing at $20 bn/year before Rudd and now has a $300 billion deficit growing at $40 bn/yr.

It is bankrupting Victoria. Farms destroyed by ever-higher fuel and power costs and ever-sillier over-regulation are shutting so fast that yours is the first Australian state to become a net importer of food.

Power generation is also moving out. Last year a politicized Green judge banned a radical new process that would have halved CO2 emissions from the Latrobe valley’s brown coal. The invention will go to China instead.

Crazed local authorities have banned new building along Victoria’s coast for fear of sea-level rise. Yet raw data from the Envisat satellite from 2004-2012 show sea level rising for eight years at a rate equivalent to just 3.2 cm/

The Economist had – until now – taken a hard-line, extremist stance about "global warming". Last week, for the first time, it conceded that the scientific literature is divided on how much warming doubling CO2 will cause. Is CO2 mitigation cost-effective? The paper, combining the official climatological equations I use as an expert reviewer for the UN’s climate panel with the standard techniques of intergenerational investment appraisal, is a bombshell. century.

The madness is Australia-wide. Environmental control officials recently told a farmer in South Australia, "We can prosecute you for shifting a rock."

A farmer in New South Wales recently watched through hole in his shed wall as a koala inspector used a penknife to gouge notches in the bark of a nearby eucalypt to simulate the creature’s claws. He did not prosecute the fraudulent inspector.

One shop in five in Cairns is shut because the fishing fleet is all but gone. Greens had insisted on a total fishing ban over a million square kilometres of the Coral Sea. Yet the fishery, described in the closure document as "near-pristine", was sustainable: the catch had been just 192 grams per square kilometre of ocean per year.

Schoolteachers openly circulate Green party propaganda in class and hold "Green weeks". Parents complain, but do nothing.

In the light of what I have seen and heard on my two-month speaking tour, I am informing the governments I advise – with great sadness – that your nation is a sovereign risk.

Australia, once a penal colony, is now a lunatic asylum.


By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

Posted by: Christopher Monckton of Brenchley AT 10:53 am   |  Permalink   |  0 Comments  |  Email

Post comment
Email Address

(max 750 characters)
* Required Fields
Note: All comments are subject to approval. Your comment will not appear until it has been approved.

 Blog, News and Latest Activities 

Disclaimer for the Lord Monckton Foundation website:

Material on this site:

Photos and material on this site are used for educational and research purposes and are sourced from media outlets and the internet. If you are the copyright owner of any material used on this site and you object to its use, and such use falls outside the fair use provisions in ss. 40 - 42 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), please email, and it will be removed. It is understood that in most countries, copyright automatically resides with the taker of the photograph or art work, unless rights are formally assigned to another.

Site Mailing List 
"The Lord Monckton Foundation shall conduct research, publish papers, educate students and the public and take every measure that may be necessary to restore the primacy and use of reason in science and public policy worldwide, especially insofar as they may bear upon the rights of the people fairly and fully to be informed, openly and freely to debate, and secretly by ballot to decide who shall govern them, what laws they shall live by and what imposts they shall endure."

The Lord Monckton Foundation

ABN 51 154 843 213 Registered Address: PO Box 371 Balwyn North VIC, Australia 3104

Ph: 03 9878 3333 - Int’l: (+61) 3 9878 3333 - Mobile: 0409 805 425

Postal Address: PO Box 14, Nunawading LPO, Nunawading VIC Australia 3131


See our Privacy, Confidential Information and Data Security Policy (here)


Site Powered By
    Turnkey Website Solutions
    Online web site design