A promising path revealing portions of the truth in Science, Public Policy, Education and the Media, is slowly gaining momentum for Climate Realists. Although reluctantly pursued, due to intransigence on the part of those holding fast to AGW as a meal ticket to various levels of authoritarian power, is rapidly becoming the only successful recourse. I refer here to legal remedies.
From its release until 2007 Al Gore's movie, An Inconvenient Truth, had powerfully influenced the masses, including the children in schools, to believe humans were causing catastrophic global warming.
Lord Monckton participated in a UK High Court case against the movie being shown to school children, where the Judge in his conclusion stated that, if the UK Government had not agreed to send to every secondary school in England a corrected guidance note making clear the mainstream scientific position on these nine “errors”, he would have made a finding that the Government’s distribution of the film and the first draft of the guidance note earlier in 2007 to all English secondary schools had been an unlawful contravention of an Act of Parliament prohibiting the political indoctrination of children. See Lord Monckton's response to the High Court Ruling here.
Similarly, a group of concerned citizens in New Zealand, after discovering that the raw data indicated no change in temperature over the period of the record and after noting that the official record from NIWA indicated a significant warming, rather than attempting to defend the charge that the 'official record' had been manipulated, took the curious defense of stating that it never was an 'official record'. See NIWA defense here.
Finally, a group of concerned citizens in Australia have been seeking a response to their observation that Australian climate 'records' show a similar bias towards warming after the raw data is manipulated. The CSIRO and the BOM have been obfuscating here too. See Anthony Cox's guest post on Jo Nova's site here.